Linguistic Criticism on John 8:1-11 |
|
|
|
1826 | S. T. Bloomfield | - a masterly defence! |
1848 | S. Davidson | - linguistic claims refuted |
1863 | H. Alford | - reviewed by Nicolson |
1886 | J. Burgon | - int. evidence assessed |
1896 | J. Burgon | - the classic defence! |
|
1900 | H. Wendt | - More interpolations? |
1912 | E.R. Buckley | - conflicting 'Lukan' evid. |
1917 | H. Cadbury | - 'Lukan theory' weak... |
1918 | H. L. Jackson | - state of scholarship |
1932 | A. T. Robertson | - scholarly hari kari |
1940 | A. Pink | - basic contextual evidence |
1950 | R. Heard | methodology useless! |
1966 | A. Johnson | a new stylistic trait found |
1984 | B. Witherington | historical integrity |
1994 | J. P. Heil | internal evidence! |
1997 | M. Schneider | MORE internal evidence |
1998 | R. A. Culpepper | NEW internal evidence! |
1999 | J. Staley | Chiasm, Unity of ch 7-8
new! |
|
2000 | J. M. C. Scott | MORE internal evidence |
2007 | A. W. Wilson | MORE internal evidence |
2010 | J.D. Punch | - a thorough review! |
. |
|
|
Check also our Textual Critics List < - here. |
|